In order to unveil the international language, each lexical item should be written separately.

Words such as "aselway," "tayri," "adabu," and "anemhal" are all part of modern Berber. They are not Kabyle and were never derived of Kabyle lexical roots.

It's absolutely useless to deny the existence of the Berber language. In fact, words such as "aselway," "aselkim," "tayri," "adabu," and "amulli" are all derived from various Berber lexical roots that have never been attested in the now impoverished Kabyle dialect.

Words such as "aselway," "aselkim," "tayri," "adabu," and "anemhal" were derived from Berber lexical roots that are unknown in the Kabyle dialect.

I think orthography should be etymological. Etymological letters or diacritics help promote textual comprehension with related or lexically similar languages.

These two Berber words come from exactly the same lexical root.

From a lexical point of view, Esperanto appears as an Indo-European language, but structurally it is an isolating language, likewise Chinese.

When I come back to the country [who knows if this virus will leave us a respite or attack us again], ask me again to continue my translation into Kabyle of the French text that I already wrote on couscous; and that I titled "Awer ifuṛ, awer yeṛdem". No doubt I will use your lexical text wisely so that every Kabyle, woman and man, is proud of it. So, please don't forget!

The lack of gender-specific words for "cousin" in English is an example of a lexical gap.

In the process of grammaticalization, an uninflected lexical word (or content word) is transformed into a grammar word (or function word).